Supreme Court

In the case of Maryland vs Dyson, specific concepts and terms such as probable causes, warrants, convictions and amendments were used in the case. These terms are used because of what the case actually is about. The case is about the drug dealer bringing illegal drugs from state to state, smuggling and selling to the public, and once the dealer was caught from the police, the police searched his vehicle and him, without pursuing to show the dealer a search warrant after requesting one. They had probable evidence and a probable cause to search the vehicle and the dealer, but did not pursue a warrant, which he had made a case before the court.

“In this case, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals held that the Fourth Amendment requires police to obtain a search warrant before searching a vehicle which they have probable cause to believe contains illegal drugs.”

This was said in the court and specifically describes the case before the court. I believe that through the amendment, the police should have been a lot more professional, and followed through with the laws and amendments.

http://law.onecle.com/ussc/527/527us466.html